Metaphysics and Morality in Kant and Hegel
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Kant and Hegel on Aesthetic Reflexivity
The paper aims at reevaluating a conception of the aesthetic that was developed by Kant and Hegel but that has been widely neglected due to the fact that their positions in aesthetics have been wrongly considered to be antagonistic to one another. The conception states that the aesthetic is a practice of reflecting on other human practices. Kant was the first to articulate this conception, but ...
متن کاملGuarding constructivism: the Pl-metaphysics of hegel and naturalists
http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/11/1/148.werner « 13 » These assumptions of separation and connection provide an illustrative example of the relative differences between diametric and concentric spaces as spatial frames for cognition. diametric and concentric structures are necessary spatialrelational conditions for framing the two different constructions of Gilligan’s moral reas...
متن کاملReal Repugnance and our Ignorance of Things-in-Themselves: A Lockean Problem in Kant and Hegel
Kant zufolge muss ein Subjekt, um Wissen von einem Objekt zu erlangen, in der Lage sein zu „beweisen“, dass das Objekt real möglich sei, d.h. zu beweisen, dass es zwischen seinen Eigenschaften weder eine logische Inkonsistenz noch einen „realen Widerspruch“ gebe. Dies ist zwar (gewöhnlich) einfach im Hinblick auf empirische Objekte, aber im Hinblick auf einzelne Dinge an sich selbst (gewöhnlich...
متن کاملLessons from Kant: On Knowledge, Morality, and Beauty
Kant’s work contains numerous inspiring ideas regarding knowledge, morality, and beauty, and I will attempt to present some of them in this short essay. Following are very brief summaries of the main lessons that I suggest to take home. Knowledge is a synthesis of concepts and sensory data; it is never obtained by sheer accumulation of data (or facts); it is obtained by the organization of mean...
متن کاملOff Her Trolley ? Frances Kamm and the Metaphysics of Morality
Consider as many case-based judgments of yours as prove necessary. Do not ignore some case-based judgments, assuming they are errors, just because they conflict with simple or intuitively plausible principles that account for some subset of your case-based judgments. Work on the assumption that a different principle can account for all of the judgments. Be prepared to be surprised at what this ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Hegel Bulletin
سال: 1998
ISSN: 2051-5367,2051-5375
DOI: 10.1017/s0263523200001257